Aafp Fluid Therapy Guidelines
To provide guidance for veterinary practitioners, the American Animal Hospital Association (AAHA) and the American Association of Feline Practitioners (AAFP) have released the AAHA/AAFP Fluid Therapy Guidelines for Dogs and Cats for use by veterinary professionals. Released May 1, the fluid therapy.
Prompt diagnosis and treatment of infectious arthritis can help prevent significant morbidity and mortality. The acute onset of monoarticular joint pain, erythema, heat, and immobility should raise suspicion of sepsis. Constitutional symptoms such as fever, chills, and rigors are poorly sensitive for septic arthritis. In the absence of peripheral leukopenia or prosthetic joint replacement, synovial fluid white blood cell count in patients with septic arthritis is usually greater than 50,000 per mm 3. Isolation of the causative agent through synovial fluid culture is not only definitive but also essential before selecting antibiotic therapy. Synovial fluid analysis is also useful to help distinguish crystal arthropathy from infectious arthritis, although the two occasionally coexist. Almost any microorganism can be pathogenic in septic arthritis; however, septic arthritis is caused by nongonococcal pathogens (most commonly Staphylococcus species) in more than 80 percent of patients.
Gram stain results should guide initial antibiotic choice. Vancomycin can be used for gram-positive cocci, ceftriaxone for gram-negative cocci, and ceftazidime for gram-negative rods.
If the Gram stain is negative, but there is strong clinical suspicion for bacterial arthritis, treatment with vancomycin plus ceftazidime or an aminoglycoside is appropriate. Evacuation of purulent material with arthrocentesis or surgical methods is necessary. Special consideration should be given to patients with prosthetic joint infection.
In this population, the intraarticular cutoff values for infection may be as low as 1,100 white blood cells per mm 3 with a neutrophil differential of greater than 64 percent.Septic arthritis is a key consideration in adults presenting with acute monoarticular arthritis. Failure to initiate appropriate antibiotic therapy within the first 24 to 48 hours of onset can cause subchondral bone loss and permanent joint dysfunction., The incidence of septic arthritis ranges widely, between four and 29 cases per 100,000 person-years, and depends on population variables and preexisting structural joint abnormalities.Because of the lack of a limiting basement plate in synovial tissues, the most common route of entry into the joint is hematogenous spread during bacteremia. – Pathogens may also enter through direct inoculation (e.g., arthrocentesis, arthroscopy, trauma) or contiguous spread from local infections (e.g., osteomyelitis, septic bursitis, abscess). – Once in the joint, microorganisms are deposited in the synovial membrane, causing an acute inflammatory response., Inflammatory mediators and pressure from large effusions lead to the destruction of joint cartilage and bone loss., A history, physical examination, and joint fluid analysis are warranted to ensure timely joint-preserving interventions.HISTORYPatients presenting with acute joint swelling, pain, erythema, warmth, and joint immobility should be screened for risk factors associated with septic arthritis ( – ).
A prospective study in the Netherlands of patients diagnosed with septic arthritis found that 84 percent of adults had an underlying medical condition and 59 percent had a previous joint disorder. In a review of musculoskeletal infections in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection, about 0.5 percent of hospitalized patients had septic arthritis, regardless of CD4 lymphocyte count or disease stage.
Particular vigilance is needed during a monoarticular flare-up of rheumatoid arthritis, because patients on immunosuppressive medications, but not biologic therapy, have a fourfold increased risk of septic arthritis. Many patients with rheumatoid arthritis are treated with anti–tumor-necrosis-factor-α, which further increases the risk of infection twofold. Risk Factors for Septic ArthritisContiguous spreadSkin infection, cutaneous ulcers,Direct inoculationPrevious intraarticular injection,Prosthetic joint: early and delayed Recent joint surgery,Hematogenous spreadDiabetes mellitus,Human immunodeficiency virus infectionHematogenous spreadImmunosuppressive medication,Intravenous drug abuseOsteoarthritisOther cause of sepsisProsthetic joint: late Rheumatoid arthritis,Sexual activity (specifically for gonococcal arthritis)Other factorsAge older than 80 years.
Risk Factors for Septic ArthritisContiguous spreadSkin infection, cutaneous ulcers,Direct inoculationPrevious intraarticular injection,Prosthetic joint: early and delayed Recent joint surgery,Hematogenous spreadDiabetes mellitus,Human immunodeficiency virus infectionHematogenous spreadImmunosuppressive medication,Intravenous drug abuseOsteoarthritisOther cause of sepsisProsthetic joint: late Rheumatoid arthritis,Sexual activity (specifically for gonococcal arthritis)Other factorsAge older than 80 years. Information from references. PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONThe physical examination should determine if the site of inflammation is intraarticular or periarticular, such as a bursa or skin. Generally, intraarticular pathology results in severe limitation of active and passive range of motion, and the joint is often held in the position of maximal intraarticular space. For example, a septic knee will be extended fully. Conversely, pain from periarticular pathology occurs only during active range of motion, and swelling will be more localized.Although septic arthritis is usually monoarticular, up to 20 percent of cases are oligoarticular. In native joints, the knee is the most commonly affected, followed by the hip, shoulder, ankle, elbow, and wrist., Infections of axial joints, such as the sternoclavicular or sacroiliac joint, may occur; however, they are more common in patients with a history of intravenous drug abuse., LABORATORY EVALUATIONSerum markers, such as white blood cell (WBC) count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein levels, are often used to determine the presence of infection or inflammatory response.
Patients with confirmed septic arthritis have been found to have normal erythrocyte sedimentation rates and C-reactive protein levels. When elevated, these markers may be used to monitor therapeutic response. Because pathogenesis may be hematogenous, blood cultures are positive in 25 to 50 percent of patients with septic arthritis., SYNOVIAL FLUID ANALYSISBecause the clinical presentation of septic arthritis may overlap with other causes of acute arthritis (, ), arthrocentesis is needed to identify the causative infectious agent. Synovial fluid should be evaluated at the bedside and then sent for WBC count with differential, crystal analysis, Gram stain, and culture – ( –, – ). In synovial fluid, a WBC count of more than 50,000 per mm 3 (50 × 10 9 per L) and a polymorphonuclear cell count greater than 90 percent have been directly correlated with infectious arthritis, although this overlaps with crystalline disease., Lower synovial fluid WBC counts may occur in persons with disseminated gonococcal disease, peripheral leukopenia, or joint replacement., Septic arthritis can coexist with crystal arthropathy; therefore, the presence of crystals does not preclude a diagnosis of septic arthritis.
Note: These are general guidelines in the interpretation of synovial fluid. Many parameters vary widely and must be interpreted in the clinical context.
Three bedside observations (color, transparency, and viscosity) are quick and easy to assess. With normal transparent fluid, words can be read clearly through the fluid. The words become less crisp and gradually obscured with increasing turbidity.
Viscosity is assessed by observing the fluid dropping from the syringe. Normal viscosity has a long, stringy tail. Note: These are general guidelines in the interpretation of synovial fluid. Many parameters vary widely and must be interpreted in the clinical context.
Aafp Practice Guidelines
Three bedside observations (color, transparency, and viscosity) are quick and easy to assess. With normal transparent fluid, words can be read clearly through the fluid. The words become less crisp and gradually obscured with increasing turbidity. Viscosity is assessed by observing the fluid dropping from the syringe. Normal viscosity has a long, stringy tail.
Information from references through, and through.Measuring synovial fluid glucose or protein is not useful because results are neither sensitive nor specific for septic arthritis. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing may help isolate less common organisms, such as Borrelia species, and should be ordered if there is a high level of clinical suspicion.
The sensitivities of synovial fluid, Gram stain, and culture vary by pathogenic organism. IMAGINGThere are no data on imaging studies that are pathognomonic for acute septic arthritis. Plain films establish a baseline and may detect fractures, chondrocalcinosis, or inflammatory arthritis. Ultrasonography is more sensitive for detecting effusions, particularly in difficult-to-examine joints, such as the hip. Magnetic resonance imaging findings that suggest an acute intraarticular infection include the combination of bone erosions with marrow edema. Imaging may allow guided arthrocentesis, particularly in difficult-to-examine joints (e.g., hip, sacroiliac, costochondral).Almost any microorganism may be pathogenic in septic arthritis.
Bacterial causes of septic arthritis include staphylococci (40 percent), streptococci (28 percent), gram-negative bacilli (19 percent), mycobacteria (8 percent), gram-negative cocci (3 percent), gram-positive bacilli (1 percent), and anaerobes (1 percent). There are various characteristic presentations depending on the pathogen, underlying medical conditions, or exposures (, – ). Clinical presentations can be broadly grouped into three categories: nongonococcal, gonococcal, and other (e.g., Lyme disease, mycobacterial, fungal). Clinical Presentations of Septic Arthritis Clinical history or exposureJoint involvementPathogenCleaning fish tank,Small joints (fingers, wrists)Mycobacterium marinumDog or cat bite,Small joints (fingers, toes)Capnocytophaga species, Pasteurella multocidaIngestion of unpasteurized dairy products,Monoarticular: sacroiliac jointBrucella speciesIntravenous drug use,Axial joints, such as sternoclavicular or sacroiliacPseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureusNail through shoeFootP. AeruginosaSexual activityTenosynovial component in hands, wrists, or anklesNeisseria gonorrhoeaeSoil exposure/gardeningMonoarticular: knee, hand, or wristNocardia species, Pantoea agglomerans, Sporothrix schenckiiSoil or dust exposure containing decomposed wood (north-central and southern United States)Monoarticular: knee, ankle, or elbowBlastomyces dermatitidisSouthwestern United States, Central and South America (primary respiratory illness)KneeCoccidioides immitisSystemic lupus erythematosus (particularly if functional hyposplenism)—N. Gonorrhoeae, Proteus species, Salmonella speciesTerminal complement deficiencyTenosynovial component in hands, wrists, or anklesN.
Clinical Presentations of Septic Arthritis Clinical history or exposureJoint involvementPathogenCleaning fish tank,Small joints (fingers, wrists)Mycobacterium marinumDog or cat bite,Small joints (fingers, toes)Capnocytophaga species, Pasteurella multocidaIngestion of unpasteurized dairy products,Monoarticular: sacroiliac jointBrucella speciesIntravenous drug use,Axial joints, such as sternoclavicular or sacroiliacPseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureusNail through shoeFootP. AeruginosaSexual activityTenosynovial component in hands, wrists, or anklesNeisseria gonorrhoeaeSoil exposure/gardeningMonoarticular: knee, hand, or wristNocardia species, Pantoea agglomerans, Sporothrix schenckiiSoil or dust exposure containing decomposed wood (north-central and southern United States)Monoarticular: knee, ankle, or elbowBlastomyces dermatitidisSouthwestern United States, Central and South America (primary respiratory illness)KneeCoccidioides immitisSystemic lupus erythematosus (particularly if functional hyposplenism)—N. Gonorrhoeae, Proteus species, Salmonella speciesTerminal complement deficiencyTenosynovial component in hands, wrists, or anklesN. Information from references, and through. NONGONOCOCCAL ARTHRITISSeptic arthritis is caused by nongonococcal pathogens in more than 80 percent of patients. Nongonococcal arthritis often affects older persons, is acute in nature, and is monoarticular in more than 80 percent of patients. Synovial fluid cultures are positive in more than 90 percent of patients with nongonococcal arthritis, as opposed to blood cultures, which are positive in only 50 percent of patients.,Gram-positive staphylococci and streptococci are the causative agents in the majority of bacterial arthritis cases in which an organism is identified, and are associated with drug abuse, cellulitis, abscesses, endocarditis, and chronic osteomyelitis.
Staphylococcus aureus is the organism most commonly found in patients with septic arthritis in the United States and other developed countries, and Streptococcus species is the next most common., The presence of methicillin-resistant S. Aureus (MRSA) is an emerging clinical problem. Although data are mostly limited to case reports, the incidence of MRSA ranges between 5 and 25 percent of bacterial arthritis cases, and tends to affect older persons, involve the shoulder, and the health care–associated MRSA strain.,Gram-negative bacilli represent approximately 14 to 19 percent of septic arthritis cases, and are associated with invasive urinary tract infections, intravenous drug use, older age, compromised immune system, and skin infections. The two most common gram-negative organisms detected in adults are Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli., Historically, Haemophilus influenzae infection has occurred more often in children, although this may be tempered by widespread H.
Empire total war ottoman empire tips. Contents DescriptionThe history of Europe over the last centuries can be seen as the history of the Ottoman Empire and a few annoying, small nations that thwarted Ottoman ambitions. Turkish expansionism has always been a part of palace politics: when a Sultan has felt secure at home he has attacked Europe; when a Sultan has felt threatened by his Janissary military commanders, he has sent them to attack.The Ottomans face challenges but within these are great opportunities. Ottoman power is unmatched in its extent and grandeur, straddling the traditional trade route between Europe and Asia. The Ottomans also have power over the whole of the Mediterranean coast of North Africa.This Turkish, Islamic empire supplanted the Orthodox Byzantine Empire in the 15th Century and since then it has had a continuing, if not always whole-hearted, ambition to expand further westwards into the heart of Europe. In living memory, Turkish armies have reached the gates of Vienna, Austria, only to be turned back by the steadfast defenders.
Influenzae type b vaccination. GONOCOCCAL ARTHRITISPatients with disseminated Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection are usually young, healthy, and sexually active. Disseminated gonococcal infection may have various clinical musculoskeletal presentations, with or without associated dermatitis. Patients typically display a migratory pattern of arthralgias, tenosynovial inflammation, or nonerosive arthritis., Blood cultures are seldom positive, and synovial fluid cultures are variable, with a positive result in only 25 to 70 percent of patients with gonococcal arthritis., When a disseminated gonococcal infection is suspected, cultures should be taken from potentially infected mucosal sites (e.g., urethra, rectum, pharynx, cervix)., PCR testing has a sensitivity of 76 percent and a specificity of 96 percent for N.
Gonorrhoeae, and may be useful in patients with culture-negative disease if the clinical scenario is unclear or similar to a reactive arthritis. OTHER INFECTIONSFungal arthritis usually has an insidious onset and indolent course., Pathogen-specific clinical scenarios are presented in., – Synovial fluid cultures or biopsy can confirm the diagnosis.Mycobacterial infectious arthritis is also indolent, which can cause a considerable delay in diagnosis, although joint damage does not occur as rapidly as it does in bacterial infections. Articular Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection typically affects the hip or knee; is usually caused by reactivation from past dissemination; and may occur without other manifestations of active tuberculosis., Synovial fluid culture is positive in 80 percent of patients with M. Tuberculosis infection. Acid-fast smears are not helpful and are often negative. Histology is not specific because it may mimic other granulomatous diseases, although synovial biopsy will be positive for M.
Tuberculosis in about 95 percent of cases.Borrelia burgdorferi infection initially causes viral-like migratory arthralgias of Lyme disease. Late disease is characterized by an intermittent oligoarthritis that usually involves the knee or other large joints. The diagnosis of Lyme arthritis can be made with a two-step serologic testing process involving enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, followed by confirmation with a Western blot or immunoblot test. Burgdorferi cannot be cultured from synovial fluid; however, PCR testing is positive in 85 percent of patients with Lyme arthritis, making it a confirmatory test. It should be noted that PCR testing cannot distinguish live from dead organisms.Empiric intravenous antibiotic treatment of septic arthritis should be based on the organism found in the Gram stain of the synovial fluid, or on the suspicion of a pathogen from the patient's clinical presentation (, – ). Treatment options include vancomycin for gram-positive cocci, ceftriaxone (Rocephin) for gram-negative cocci, and ceftazidime (Fortaz) for gram-negative rods ( ).
If the Gram stain is negative but there is suspicion of bacterial arthritis, vancomycin plus either ceftazidime or an aminoglycoside is appropriate. Adjustments to the administration route and the duration of treatment should be based on the clinical response and microbiology results.
The Sanford Guide (; subscription required) is a resource for the management of infectious syndromes. It includes dosing options for patients with renal insufficiency and drug allergies, and lists common drug interactions. Information from reference.The duration of therapy in patients with nongonococcal septic arthritis is typically three to four weeks.
Therapy for disseminated gonococcal infection involves a third-generation cephalosporin, such as ceftriaxone, for 24 to 48 hours after improvement begins, followed by oral therapy. The clinical response should be rapid, with symptoms improving within 24 to 48 hours. Treatment then may be switched to oral cefixime (Suprax), or ciprofloxacin (Cipro) if quinolone resistance is not a concern, for at least one week. Treatment of chlamydia also should be considered in the absence of appropriate testing. Treatment of fungal arthritis is species-dependent, but usually includes an oral azole or parenteral amphotericin B., Lyme arthritis responds well to parenteral ceftriaxone or oral doxycycline.In addition to antibiotic therapy, evacuation of purulent material is necessary. Guidelines from 2006 do not distinguish between arthrocentesis and surgical methods. Repeated daily joint aspirations are successful during the first five days of treatment.
With each aspirate, synovial fluid WBC count, polymorphonuclear cell count, Gram stain, and culture should be evaluated to ensure clinical response. Open or arthroscopic techniques can be used to surgically drain the infected joint.
Arthroscopic drainage is associated with rapid recovery and low morbidity. Direct visualization of the joint tissue facilitates the lysis of adhesions, drainage of purulent pockets, and debridement of necrotic material.Before antibiotics were available, two-thirds of patients died from septic arthritis. Current mortality rates of bacterial arthritis range from 10 to 20 percent, depending on the presence of comorbid conditions, such as older age, coexisting renal or cardiac disease, and concurrent immunosuppression., Factors associated with death include age 65 years or older, and infection in the shoulder, elbow, or at multiple sites.After completing antimicrobial therapy, patients with S. Aureus septic arthritis regain 46 to 50 percent of their baseline joint function. In contrast, adults with pneumococcal septic arthritis who survive infection (the mortality rate is approximately 20 percent) will return to 95 percent of their baseline joint function after completing antimicrobial therapy. Morbidity (e.g., amputation, arthrodesis, prosthetic surgery, severe functional deterioration) occurs in one-third of patients with bacterial arthritis, usually affecting older patients, those with preexisting joint disease, and those with synthetic intraarticular material.Prosthetic joint infections occur in 0.86 to 1.1 percent of knee arthroplasties, and in 0.3 to 1.7 percent of hip arthroplasties., These infections may result in failure of the joint replacement. In prosthetic joint infections, bacterial adherence to prosthetic surfaces forms biofilms, which can lead to increased resistance to the host's immune system and to antimicrobials.
–Prosthetic joint infections are usually caused by gram-positive cocci, including coagulase-negative staphylococci and S. Aureus., Other organisms, such as gram-negative bacilli, and mycobacteria, have also been implicated.
Polymicrobial infections after hip and knee arthroplasties have been reported in up to 20 percent of patients. Risk factors for the development of prosthetic joint infections include previous fracture, seropositive rheumatoid arthritis, high body mass index, revision arthroplasty, and surgical site infections., – lists the three categories of prosthetic joint infections with typical pathogenesis, timing, clinical presentation, and mode of infection. Phases of Prosthetic Joint Infections InfectionTiming after joint replacementClinical presentationMode of infectionCommon pathogensEarlyLess than three monthsErythema, warmth, fever, chills, joint pain, effusion, excessive perioperative drainageDuring implantationStaphylococcus aureus, gram-negative bacilliDelayedThree to 24 monthsPersistent pain and/or aseptic looseningDuring implantationCoagulase-negative staphylococci, Propionibacterium acnesLateMore than 24 monthsSudden-onset joint pain; fever and leukocytosis less likelyHematogenousSame as native joints. Phases of Prosthetic Joint Infections InfectionTiming after joint replacementClinical presentationMode of infectionCommon pathogensEarlyLess than three monthsErythema, warmth, fever, chills, joint pain, effusion, excessive perioperative drainageDuring implantationStaphylococcus aureus, gram-negative bacilliDelayedThree to 24 monthsPersistent pain and/or aseptic looseningDuring implantationCoagulase-negative staphylococci, Propionibacterium acnesLateMore than 24 monthsSudden-onset joint pain; fever and leukocytosis less likelyHematogenousSame as native joints. Information from references, and through.A key distinction in the diagnostic workup of patients with a prosthetic joint infection is that the intraarticular WBC cutoff values for infection may be as low as 1,100 per mm 3 (1.10 × 10 9 per L), with a neutrophil differential of greater than 64 percent. This low WBC count, combined with occasionally more indolent clinical presentations, can make diagnosis problematic. Diagnostic imaging modalities include fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and combined leukocyte-marrow imaging., Antimicrobial treatment must be effective against surface-adhering, biofilm-producing bacteria., Debridement, exchange, or permanent removal of the prosthesis may be necessary, depending on the clinical scenario.
In some persons, long-term suppressive antimicrobial therapy may be warranted. Research is being performed on the development of antibiofilm technology to reduce the incidence of prosthetic joint infections.,The use of prophylactic antibiotics for invasive dental, genitourinary, gastrointestinal, and other invasive procedures within the first two years after prosthetic joint implantation is controversial.
The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons recommends that physicians strongly consider antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with one or more risk factors (i.e., comorbidities, immunosuppression, and previous infection). However, a more recent prospective case-control study does not support this recommendation, showing no change in the incidence of prosthetic joint infections with antibiotic prophylaxis. The decision to use prophylactic antibiotics should be made on a case-by-case basis with input from the orthopedic surgeon and with consideration of underlying comorbidities.
Every cat parent I know worries when a cat has to go under anesthesia, including me. Even though I’ve assisted with all sorts of anesthetic procedures and surgeries in my years working in veterinary clinics, and even though I understand how it all works and what constitutes safe anesthetic practice, it still doesn’t completely take the worry out of it. Knowing what to expect when your cat has to undergo anesthesia, and prior to the procedure so that you can be sure that your cat’s anesthesia will be done in the safest possible way, can help ease the worry factor.
Varying standards of careOne of the problems with safe anesthesia is that standards of care can vary widely from one veterinary practice to the next. While I would hope that no veterinarian will ever knowingly put an animal’s safety at risk, I’ve heard from far too many people about questionable standards of care at their veterinary practice when it comes to anesthetic procedures. This may be particularly true for mixed practices. Cats are not small dogs, and there is evidence that cats undergoing anesthesia have a higher mortality rate than dogs due to their unique physiology and small size. Guidelines to ensure safer anesthesiaThe American Association of Feline Practitioners (AAFP) just released its first Feline Anesthesia Guidelines to the veterinary community with the goal of ensuring safer anesthesia for feline patients.The guidelines address specific causes of disparities and ways of avoiding complications associated with monitoring, airway management, fluid therapy, and recovery.
Additionally, the guidelines discuss other important aspects of feline anesthesia, including perianesthetic anxiety and stress, perianesthetic monitoring by physical and electronic means, the role of underlying diseases such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), and the correct use of anesthesia equipment. One size does not fit allI find it particularly reassuring that the guidelines stress that each cat is an individual. “By proactively developing an individualized anesthetic plan that considers the uniqueness of each feline patient and recognizing that ‘one size does not fit all,’ the experience for the cat can be improved and the outcome successful. It is our hope that these guidelines will become the practice’s go-to resource and each team member will have a new awareness of all the tools and techniques available to them,” said Guidelines Co-Chairs Susan M. Gogolski, DVM, PMP, DABVP (Canine/Feline) and Sheilah A. Robertson, BVMS (Hons), PhD, DACVAA, DECVAA, DACAW, DECAWBM (WSEL), MRCVS in a joint statement.To access the guidelines, supplemental resources, and client brochure, visit:.To access the AAFP’s consumer site with anesthesia information for cat parents, visit:.